" /> storytelling: October 24, 2005 Archives

« October 23, 2005 | Main | October 25, 2005 »

October 24, 2005

a tag line challenge

So my tag line for Tied to the Tracks stinks. I knew it wasn't very good. I'm terrible at tag lines. As I've said before, my big hope is that the marketing people at Putnam will come up with a humdinger and I won't have to think about it anymore, but in the meantime, I'm going to put out a challenge.

If you come up with a great tag line that I love and Putnam loves too, enough to actually use, I'll put you in the acknowledgements and otherwise shower you with thanks, and a signed first edition, and anything else I can think of.

What you need to know:

The novel is about a woman from New Jersey (Angeline Mangiamele) who goes down to a small private college in rural Georgia to make a documentary about a literary legend, a seventy-plus African American woman called Zula Bragg. The name of Angie's documentary film company is Tied to the Tracks. The chair of the English department at this college (John Grant) happens to be somebody Angie had an intense affair with for a whole summer five years earlier. Neither of them ever really got over the other, and now things are about to get sticky all over again. There's a mystery about a long-ago love affair gone wrong, there are secondary story lines about other couples, and there's a lot of talk about food, religion, race, and lesbians. And there's sex.

Go forth, and tag.

historical fiction, and political simplifications

One New Orleans during the War of 1812 was a really complicated place. More complicated than any other city of an equal size, primarily because the way race and society intersected. There was a huge population of Free People of Color (in official documents, such a person's name was followed by FMC or FWC) who build the beginnings of what we would call a middle or working class. There were slaves from all over the continent of Africa and the islands from Jamaica to Haiti. There were the remnants of various Indian nations, and of course there were large groups of people who intersected all these racial groups, for which there was a whole vocabulary of terms like quadroon and octaroon and redbone.

The white population included poor immigrants from all over Europe, Creoles (middle and upper class people who were the results of the early settlement by French colonists), the backwoods whites, also Francophone, the remnants of the Spanish who ruled for a few years, villages of fishermen and sailors and pirates, and the encroaching Yankee whites, who began to come to New Orleans as soon as the ink was dry on the Louisiana purchase in order to pursue business.

This all sounds complicated enough, but it gets worse. It would be easy and comfortable to assume that internally at least the subgroups got along, but it wasn't like that at all. Within the community of people with origins in Africa (slave or free) there was a very strict social order, with the newest arrived from Africa at the bottom. The black population was in general not enamored of the Indian tribes, because some of the tribes had been enthusiastic blackbirders -- going after runaway slaves and returning them for the reward. The whites did what they could to encourage the animosity, because of course they would have been in trouble if the non-whites had got together with uprising on their minds. Among the Indian tribes there was huge disagreement about how to handle the war, and ongoing white encroachment. Things got to the point where Indians fought Indians and the result? More land for the whites, less for the Indians, and the push westward.

And if you think you know about the way rich white men interacted with Free Women of Color, my guess is that you got that information from novels and movies, most of which simplified or romanticized the situation. The historical work I've read on this social phenomenon is far different from the usual portrayal of Creole Balls. The problem is that if you read something often enough, you begin to believe it. As is the case with what people think they know about voodoo (or voudou, or vodou, as the religion is more usually called as it is practiced in southern Louisiana).

So here I sit trying to tell the story, aware that my readers bring certain preconceptions (many of which are wrong in whole or part) to this novel. And aware that I am going to have to challenge many of those closely held assumptions and that some people won't like it, no matter how carefully I tread.

what's fair

OW posted a comment here about GetupGrrl, who kept a weblog during the years of her infertility treatment and up to the birth of her son, who was brought into the world with the help of a gestational surrogate.

Here's OW's comment:

I just read in a comment on Blogging Baby in a post about copyrights and infertility that GetUpGrrl is writing a book. Don't you think that's deceptive since she always appeared to be writing her blog to help other women. Writing a book for money is helping herself and it's my feeling that she wrote her story and left her readers hanging so that she could sell them a book to get the ending.

I pulled this comment/question up because I think it's important and I'd like to state my position on this very clearly.

Getupgrrl's weblog was a joy to read. Funny, insightful, beautifully written, full of information. My own troubles with secondary infertility are long ago, but the scars run deep and more than that, there wasn't ever anyone to talk to about those scars. People don't know what to do with the kind of pain that comes with the loss of multiple pregnancies, and so you keep it to yourself. Getupgrrl's blog made it possible for some women to come out of hiding and talk about their losses and anger and sorrow.

I don't ever remember her promising that she wouldn't write for broader publication. In fact, I encouraged her to do just that, because even a popular weblog reaches a limited number of people. There are women out there who would be helped by her story. If she makes some money with the book, I don't mind that either. She's not a non profit organization. When her book comes out -- as I hope it does -- I will buy copies to give away, and I'll be glad of the chance to support the work she does for all of us.

And finally -- the readers of the weblog did get the ending. A tremendously happy ending, the story of her son's birth.