« oooh, shiny | Main | a closer look at dialect in dialogue »
on hiding things
Dianna asked:
I was just wondering if you ever hide historical information in your stories.This kind of thing has come up a number of times when I'm writing about illness. I know what is wrong with character X because I've researched it, but medical knowledge of the time wasn't so far along. For example, I'm guessing nobody picked up on what killed Dolly Wilde -- beyond the fact that she was suffering from exposure during a winter storm. There are a lot of hints, but unless you were really paying attention and were able to sort out one set of symptoms from another, you probably wouldn't pick up on it. Any quesses?For example, I just learned about how green-papered rooms killed many in the 18th century via arsenic fumes. Of course, people didn't figure this out for a long time.
And I got to wondering if authors, such as yourself, hide this kind of historical information in the plot without making it explicit. For example, having a character die an unexplained death in a bedroom with green wall paper.
Do you write in layers - the explicit layer and the secret layer?
Just wondering - it's a lark of a question by a non-professional.
The other more obvious case was the epidemic in Paradise when so many people died of what seemed like very different causes -- sepsis, childbed fever, putrid sore throat. The same agent (strep) was at work in all these cases but in 1802 that hadn't yet been determined.
There are a few other such cases, but I'm not going to point them out, specifically.
July 26, 2005 09:56 PM
Comments
I was hoping you would say yes. How interesting.
I'll have to re-read to figure out what really killed Dolly Wilde.
Posted by: Dianna at July 27, 2005 07:50 AM
Sara has been accused of being too subtle with her storylines. I mean, here's a simple question: Why did Elizabeth's mother go back to England without the Judge? Because her pregnancy was hazardous and she missed her family and homeland? Not on your life. On my fourth or fifth reread through the series, with some hints from the author beforehand, I FINALLY started picking up some of the clues. Fire Along the Sky gets far more explicit with it, probably because the Yahoogroup had been so perplexed by the whole thing that Sara figured she'd better help us dense readers out. ;)
I'm just now getting to the part in this read-through where Dolly's about to die. I'll pay special attention. The pica (craving dirt and rocks) has got to be something, right? hmm.
Posted by: Rachel at July 27, 2005 09:08 AM
Rachel -- remember what I said about sorting out two sets of symptoms? Keep that in mind as you think about pica.
And yes, I am often told I'm too subtle. Really I think is that I have this urge to write mysteries, but mysteries that hide beneath the surface. For the readers to solve. Or not.
Posted by: sara at July 27, 2005 09:36 AM
I did a little research this morning and have a theory; I'll keep it in mind as I read (a whole hour every morning during the kids' swimming lessons; oh bliss!) and see if it matches up.
Posted by: Rachel at July 27, 2005 09:44 AM
P.S. I liked the way you clarified which illnesses had been depicted in the storyline in the afterword for Dawn on a Distant Shore.
Posted by: Rachel at July 27, 2005 09:45 AM
Rachel -- sometimes I can't keep the information to myself. Hence the author's note.
Posted by: sara at July 27, 2005 10:11 AM
OK, I'm going to make a guess regarding Dolly's death.
Firstly, I think her original disorder (but not the one she died of, at least not directly) was schizophrenia or a similar mental disorder, which progressed out of a hormonal/chemical imbalance which started as postpartum depression. The pica, the "dementia" -- and the fact that she's far too young for alzheimer's -- led me to this conclusion.
I think she died of cat scratch fever, maybe? Otherwise why mention the cat scratches and the animal bite on her hand? It wouldn't have been rabies, because surely the villagers would have recognized the signs of that straight off, and there'd be animals around getting it.
How close am I?
P.S. I'd forgotten how much I liked the new couples in Fire Along the Sky. (romantic sigh). And I love Jennet, and I cried again at Hannah's story.
Posted by: Rachel at July 27, 2005 10:21 PM
Rachel --
pretty close. You're right about the first part, starting with postpartum.
You're almost right about the second part, but remember the very first scene of the novel when Hannah comes back to the mountain and she kills the fox? There was rabies around in that late summer/fall.
Generally people don't realize that rabies can take a really long time to progress to the mania/death stage. I only know this because I have a friend who is a specialist in infectious diseases at Mott Children's Hospital in Ann Arbor, and she told an interesting (but gruesome) story about a ten year old girl who presented with all kinds of strange neurological symptoms nobody could diagnose. Her brain -- said this friend -- was basically melting into sludge.
They were interviewing the family yet again to ask about anything unusual with the child in the recent past when her uncle remembered that six months earlier they had re-sided the house and in the process, disturbed a nest of bats. That night the girl woke the whole house up screaming that a bat was in her room, but they couldn't find any bat, and they assumed she was having a nightmare.
The autopsy confirmed rabies, and that the original site was most probably a scratch on her hand. It took more than six months for the disease to actually reach her brain.
This is an awful story, I know. I never did like bats and now I'm really afraid of them. My husband got scratched by a bat last year -- on the scalp! -- and he went through the entire rabies treatment. The health department here made the decision on proceeding with the shots, but I would have insisted, even if they had not.
If you read closely you'll also note that Dolly has other symptoms in the chapters before her death, as well, all consistent with rabies.
Posted by: sara at July 27, 2005 11:00 PM
Whoa, I've enjoyed reading all of your books, and I never really thought about all those details and layers before, I'm sad to say. Time for a read-through!
Posted by: Sabrina Rubin at August 10, 2005 12:13 AM
